Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Internet Censorship & Proj. Freeweb  (Read 456 times)
Fractal Resonance

Totally Awesome Member

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Age: 668
Location: A Series of Tubes
Posts: 601


KAGE BUNSHIN NO JUTSU


View Profile WWW
« on: February 24, 2010, 10:11:54 am »

Not sure if anyone is aware of the censorship currently going down in Australia; basically one of the politicians is trying to get a content filter set up, mandatory in nature, that blocks certain graphic content. Right now it's not entirely disagreeable but the reality is that it's a huge step backwards for internet censorship, even though the list consists mostly on blocking pornography of small breasted women, female "squirting," and hentai. This is done under the guise that they're doing it to filter out child pornography.

In spite of the fact that I act like an idiot on here, I'm all for seeing child porn taken off the web. But the censorship has already markedly spread from pornographic material; they're also blacklisting websites related to drug use, last I checked. These websites are not encouraging drug use, but rather showing individuals how to safely use drugs in a fashion that is not immediately harmful to their person. If you care a lot about free speech or freedom to information, this should probably concern you.

Furthermore, these content filters are starting to go up in a lot of countries. France apparently recently enacted a working filter, and Germany had legislation in the works. I don't know the detail of those filters but even if it's under a supposedly noble guise (i.e. taking 12chan down), it seems to be a great way to try to circumvent actually catching the pedophiles and sex offenders.

To those particularly e-savvy, you probably know that my opening post is so titled because of the recent string of DDoS attacks that Aussies leveled against their own government website (though probably 75% of that was bored white American kids, if we're being realistic). Obviously this didn't do much (except encourage more media attention), but now the anons and other groups doing this are moving towards real life protesting, now dubbed Project Freeweb (smells like Chanology).

I'm not sure I particularly care about the DDoS because they never accomplish anything but mild annoyance (or brb, soup), but I am sort of curious what a forum mostly consisting of (mostly) non-channers has to think about people actually protesting this legislation, etc. I haven't gotten involved but it's sort of funny to watch, but I am pretty leery about e-censorship enacted by governments. Any opinions, or am I just wasting my time here?
Logged

[16:24] <Cream|Piano> I nearly changed my nick to pedo instead of piano then because of you guys >:|
Jader
The Gorilla King
Global Moderator

Totally Awesome Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 561


RP Legend since 1856


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2010, 10:45:28 am »

I have mixed feelings about this one. Sure I'm all for banning child pornography and obscene violent and sexual images, but if it starts there, where is the line drawn? Who decides what is vulgar and what is not? We have become such a comfortably numb society to so many graphic images that would completely shock our past generations into a coma, and now it's hard to tell what shocks who, how it shocks them, and if it should shock them. And with most governmental figures being older, I can foresee a lot of things being censored or outright banned completely on the interwebz.

It's a precarious situation. We need to be careful.
Logged

"Let's have a bachelor party with chicks, and booze, and guns, and firetrucks!" -Dope
Fractal Resonance

Totally Awesome Member

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Age: 668
Location: A Series of Tubes
Posts: 601


KAGE BUNSHIN NO JUTSU


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2010, 10:52:28 am »

Personally I didn't care about it that much until I heard they were "extending" the censorship to websites promoting safe drug use. I'm not a druggie, but that just crossed some sort of line for me.
Logged

[16:24] <Cream|Piano> I nearly changed my nick to pedo instead of piano then because of you guys >:|
Jader
The Gorilla King
Global Moderator

Totally Awesome Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 561


RP Legend since 1856


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2010, 04:27:25 pm »

Yeah, that's just plain ridiculous. People DO DRUGS, and the government likes to sit there and pretend they don't. It's gonna happen, people, whether you like it or not, and having a few websites up that promotes the safety and proper instruction of doing these drugs in my mind is a no brainer.
Logged

"Let's have a bachelor party with chicks, and booze, and guns, and firetrucks!" -Dope
Fractal Resonance

Totally Awesome Member

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Age: 668
Location: A Series of Tubes
Posts: 601


KAGE BUNSHIN NO JUTSU


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2010, 04:51:16 pm »

Well, to be honest, I can even understand people being ticked off about the issue with content. I mean, they are literally banning "small breasted women". What...? I know the industry isn't well known for its feminist roots but it somehow seems wrong to ban people for not having disgusting implants or something.

And the censorship allllways spreads. It'll be pr0n & drugs, but then it ends up applying to other stuff before you know it.
Logged

[16:24] <Cream|Piano> I nearly changed my nick to pedo instead of piano then because of you guys >:|
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: